Skip to content
UN Safety Council divides over evacuations of threatened Afghans

There are little diplomatic steps which are very ridiculous, within the mild of the fiasco attributable to the hasty withdrawal of america from Afghanistan. Shortly earlier than the final American soldier left Kabul, the United Nations Safety Council adopted a decision on Monday, August 30 in New York, asking the Taliban to honor their commitments, “With regard to the secure departure from Afghanistan of Afghans and overseas nationals”. China and Russia abstained, nevertheless, additional limiting the scope of the Western-backed initiative.

Article reserved for our subscribers Learn additionally After twenty years of navy presence and 5 months of wandering the Biden administration, the final American troopers have left Kabul

Supported by France, the UK and america, the textual content doesn’t point out the institution of a “Protected zone” round Kabul airport, thus far the one exit level from the nation, regardless of calls to this impact from Emmanuel Macron. “It’s fairly achievable”, had judged, Sunday, August 29, the French president throughout his journey to Iraq. The Taliban didn’t cover their rejection of such a tool, they who’ve sought to dissuade the Afghans from leaving the nation since they got here to energy on August 15.

Article reserved for our subscribers Learn additionally Kabul’s imprint on Emmanuel Macron’s journey to Iraq

The textual content as a substitute claims “Securing the airport and the encompassing space”, now totally managed by the brand new regime. He denounces the bomb assault that occurred final Thursday and claimed by the native department of the Islamic State group. The decision additionally requires entry “Protected and unfettered” to the populations for the humanitarian employees nonetheless current there, particularly the UN companies. And insists on respect for human rights, these of ladies particularly, and the combat in opposition to terrorism.

Beijing and Moscow abstain

Not sufficient to encourage Russian and Chinese language diplomacy to offer their approval. To justify their abstention, the representatives of the 2 nations had been, quite the opposite, very crucial of a decision thought-about as a diversionary maneuver, within the midst of the Western debacle. In Beijing as in Moscow, the humiliation inflicted on america might be a motive for satisfaction, the chaos and the safety dangers it generates are thought-about worrying, even when the 2 capitals in a short time established contacts with the Taliban. .

Learn the editorial of the “World”: In Kabul, the worst state of affairs

For China’s deputy ambassador, america and its allies have left behind the“Large disaster they created, whereas inserting the blame and accountability on the neighboring nations of Afghanistan and the Safety Council”. Beijing has blamed the American strike on Sunday, which triggered the demise of a number of members of the identical household. As for the Russian ambassador, he judged that the mission was not exact sufficient about terrorist threats and didn’t tackle the financial and humanitarian impression of the freezing of Afghan belongings deposited in america.

You may have 46.19% of this text to learn. The remainder is for subscribers solely.

Not all news on the site expresses the point of view of the site, but we transmit this news automatically and translate it through programmatic technology on the site and not from a human editor.