Tucker Carlson: Media Won’t Investigate Motives for Waukesha Massacre – Here’s Why | Top stories

Tucker Carlson: Media Won’t Investigate Motives for Waukesha Massacre – Here’s Why

| Latest News Headlines | Usa news

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Last Friday, Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of all charges against him in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Two days later, a black nationalist BLM supporter drove an SUV on a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin. It was a killing.

Six people were killed, including three grandmothers and an eight-year-old boy. Forty-seven people were seriously injured, many of them children. Here is the description of a witness to the scene:

WITNESS: We were sitting, my daughter was sitting at my feet and I was standing on top of her and what I saw was a red SUV knocked over a gentleman, I think it was a gentleman in a suit, and it was his body was trampled by the front and rear wheels.

Police say the man who did this is a career criminal called Darrell Brooks. Tonight, Brooks has not publicly explained why he committed mass murder. Instead, the media and local authorities decided to speak up for him, and the main thing they want you to know is that these murders had absolutely nothing to do with Kyle Rittenhouse’s verdict two days before. Nothing at all. The timing is just one of those amazing coincidences.


“There is no evidence that this was a terrorist incident,” said the Waukesha police chief. But if indiscriminately killing women and children in a Christmas parade isn’t terrorism, then what is it?

Well, it’s a car accident. Here’s how Twitter’s internal press team described it. “Five people died and more than 40 injured after the car passed through the parade.” Auto. It’s the red SUV’s fault.

Other news outlets had another explanation at hand. Turns out they told us Brooks was on the run from a knife fight. And the implication, of course, was that he got scared and walked through the parade by accident. You know, like you. then MSNBC went deeper into that theory and suggested that the police somehow tricked Darrell Brooks into driving on people by shooting him.

JIM CAVANAUGH, FORMER ATF: The report from NBC is that he may have been in a knife fight or stabbing. I have known stab wounds and I tell you that these are very bloody events. Criminals or participants often have blood on them, even if it comes from a victim they stabbed. Or they can cut each other if it’s a knife fight. They often run with the bloody knife. So this guy might have been in the car with a bloody knife and blood all over him. He saw the police barricade on the parade route and walked through it. The officer fired and then he was going to do whatever he, or them, to get away when he knocked down those gang members is just an act of murder in cold blood.

So Brooks was doing all he could to escape the police so effectively, it was the cop’s fault. Except no, that’s not what happened. Eyewitnesses, many eyewitnesses have described Brooks zigzagging down the street trying to murder as many innocent people as he could. These murders were absolutely intentional. And no, Brooks was not being chased by the police. It’s a lie. Too bad for this theory.

So the question remains, why did Darrell Brooks commit a mass murder in Waukesha? The media don’t seem interested in finding out, not even a little bit. So they decided to ignore the story altogether. And they are.


The subpoenas issued to Roger Stone by a bogus congressional committee are apparently more important than six deaths. Like the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, as far as the national media are concerned, this is simply not happening.

The more you learn about Darrell Brooks, the easier it is to understand why the media doesn’t want to talk about him. Brooks’ social media feeds are teeming with racist and black nationalist propaganda. In one of his rap songs, he includes lines by Malcolm X justifying racial hatred against whites. He posted a photo of a bowl of fruit arranged to display the letters BLM with a raised fist. And not without significance, Brooks also criticized the jury’s verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse case.

WAUKESHA, WI – NOVEMBER 22: People hold candles and kiss each other during a vigil at Cutler Park on November 22, 2021 in Waukesha, Wisconsin. Five people were killed and several injured after Darrell Brooks, Jr. drove an SUV on a holiday parade route on November 21. The vigil takes place in Cutler Park, near the crime scene, to honor the victims. (Photo by Jim Vondruska / Getty Images)

On Facebook, activist One BLM was happy to connect the dots here. He describes the mass murder of Brooks as retaliation for overseeing Rittenhouse’s acquittal.

BLM ACTIVIST VAUM MAYES: They’ve got someone in custody. We may have to wait and see what they say, why this happened. It seems that it is possible that the revolution started in Wisconsin. It all started with this Christmas parade. … The first person who contacted me said it had to do with the verdict.

It has to do with the verdict. This is the obvious conclusion. Is it true? Again, we haven’t confirmed it, but we can be absolutely certain that the national media won’t spend any time trying to find out. Why? Because they are involved.


News organizations spent over a year telling us that a case that had precisely nothing to do with race was something of a referendum on black civil rights and the rise of white supremacy. So if it turns out that these lies, and they are lies, six people are murdered. They will probably be the last to tell us.

We know Darrell Brooks should never have been on the streets in the first place, he was a really hateful person. Do you want evidence ? Well, he bragged about having pimped his 16-year-old girlfriend.

BROOKS: Now all of a sudden I’m a pedophile? Let me explain this to you. Ten years ago, in 2006, I caught a case with the mom of my oldest daughter. Yes. My little mother. … I didn’t know the female dog was 16 at the time. She made a statement to the police, yeah, she hoes and I was a pimp and she was 16, and I didn’t know that, okay.

Yes. So for some reason this guy has spent most of his life free. A few weeks ago, probably unsurprisingly, he was accused of hitting the mother of his youngest child in the face and then running her over with his car, so he should have been in jail for that. But the Milwaukee County District Attorney, a radical called John Chisholm, released Brooks on $ 1,000 bail.

So $ 1,000 for beating and crushing a woman. Why? Well, because John Chisholm thinks the bail is racist. A few years ago, Chisholm recognized that letting violent criminals out of prison would certainly cost innocent lives. But, he explained, it’s always worth it, because fairness.

“Will there be someone I turn away, or put in a treatment program, who’s going to come out and kill someone? You bet. Guaranteed. Guaranteed. It doesn’t invalidate it.” ‘global approach.”

In other words, the death of innocent people, old ladies, little children is a small price to pay because the principle of fairness is so beautiful and so important. It’s a sickly way of thinking. This is how cult leaders and dictators think. It is not a western worldview, but suddenly it is a dominant position within the Democratic Party.


Jonathan Swan of Axios tried to convince Michigan Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib to explain what would happen if we shut down all federal prisons in this country, as she asks.

SWAN: How well have you tackled a potential downside to releasing into society every person who is currently in a federal person?

TLAIB: Yeah again, I think everyone’s like, oh my god, we’re just going to free everyone.

SWAN: But that’s what the bill says.

TLAIB: Yeah, but have you seen how many people are mentally ill in prison right now?

SWAN: No, I know, but the law you passed actually says release everyone in 10 years.

TLAIB: Yeah in 10 years, but think about it who we’re dating.

SWAN: But they were like human traffickers, child sex abusers.

TLAIB: No, I know.

SWAN: So are you saying you don’t support this?

TLAIB: No, I approve of the Breath Act.

SWAN: Your proposal is so radical that it frees everyone and what I’m trying to tell you.

TLAIB: In 10 years and obviously, there is a process to know how to get out of mass incarceration and go to care first.

Totally indifferent. Human traffickers? Yes. Rashida Tlaib doesn’t care. In the end, she refused to give Swan a single example of a criminal, however violent or dangerous, who should stay behind bars, not one.


So what if we did this if we actually emptied the prisons? As Democrats demand it, we get a taste of the consequences by looking at what’s going on in the San Francisco Bay Area.

There is nothing fair about what is going on there. It’s theft, the big picture, it’s anarchy, it’s violent chaos in which the weak will always suffer the most. Why do we have civilization in the first place? Precisely to prevent that. So you must be wondering why they are encouraging it.

This article is adapted from Tucker Carlson’s opening commentary on the November 23, 2021 edition of “Tucker Carlson Tonight”.

Top Stories Yahoo news Tucker Carlson: Media Won’t Investigate Motives for Waukesha Massacre – Here’s Why

Not all news on the site expresses the point of view of the site, but we transmit this news automatically and translate it through programmatic technology on the site and not from a human editor.
Back to top button