Reviews | Of course, Biden’s plan costs a lot of money. But the price of inaction is higher.
| News Today | Google News
Childcare also allows parents, and especially mothers, to work outside the home. The Universal Kindergarten in the District of Columbia, introduced in 2009, increased the participation rate of mothers of young children by 10 percentage points. Universal child care in Quebec, launched in 1996, has helped the province achieve the highest rate of working women in their prime in the world. The resulting increase in tax revenue largely covered the cost of the Quebec program.
But overall, the United States is paying the price for a failure to invest significant federal funds in child care and early childhood education, and we will continue on that path if child care funding is reduced or removed from the Democrats’ platform. The labor force participation of American mothers is 19% lower than that of similar childless women. As recently as 1990, we led the world in the number of women in our workforce, but we have since slipped to the bottom of the rankings, and the lack of investment in child care. children is one of the main culprits.
Another culprit is the lack of guaranteed paid family leave. Mr Biden had originally planned to provide all workers with 12 weeks’ wages for a new child, serious illness, military deployment, death in the family or in the event of domestic violence and sexual assault, which would have enabled 18 million people – more than a tenth of the entire civilian workforce – to take paid vacation each year.
Dropping this provision of the package, which Mr Biden did to appease Mr Manchin, means these millions of people will either face a loss of income to care for themselves or their families or neglect them. this care and continue to work. Guaranteeing just four weeks, as the House leadership has proposed, will not get postpartum parents or critically ill spouses very far.
The United States now guarantees 12 weeks of unpaid family leave (and this is only valid for the 56% who are entitled). Without a guaranteed pay, 7% of all employees in 2018 had to take time off but didn’t, and the majority said it was because they couldn’t afford it. Many of those who did manage to take unpaid leave experienced financial difficulties: more than three-quarters of people who received only part-time pay or nothing at all cut spending and around 30% borrowed money. ‘money or postponed payment of their bills. Almost one in five has had to turn to public assistance.
On the other hand, paid time off would not only give people the money they need to survive and avoid debt, it would also keep them committed to their jobs by allowing them to retire without financial penalty when the life demands it. . This is true not only for new parents who need time to bond and care for new babies, but also for those whose loved ones are suffering from a health emergency or a new disability. It is estimated that six million more people would stay connected to the workforce if we had paid time off. Without it, we will continue to bleed workers.
Some of the people we lose are forced to move away to care for disabled or elderly family members. Over 800,000 people are on waiting lists to receive professional home care through Medicaid (and that’s just for those who have spent their assets, or never had enough to start, to qualify for the program). Democrats initially proposed spending $ 400 billion on home care for the disabled and the elderly, which would have been enough to clear the Medicaid waiting list.
News Today abc News Reviews | Of course, Biden’s plan costs a lot of money. But the price of inaction is higher.