Obergefell, the plaintiff in the SCOTUS same-sex marriage decision, said it was ‘quite telling’ that Clarence Thomas left out the legalization of interracial marriage case after saying the courts should deal with other matters privacy case | Latest News Headlines

Top stories | World News

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Clarence Thomas and his wife and conservative activist Virginia Thomas.Drew Angerer/Getty Image

  • The Supreme Court on Friday struck down the abortion rights established by Roe v. Wade.

  • Clarence Thomas has said the court should “reconsider” rulings on marriage and same-sex relationships.

  • Jim Obergefell said Thomas omitted the rulings on interracial marriage because it “affects him personally.”

Jim Obergefell, the plaintiff behind the Supreme Court’s landmark same-sex marriage ruling, said Friday that Justice Clarence Thomas omitted Loving v. Virginia on her list of Supreme Court decisions to “reconsider” because it “affects her personally.”

“It affects him personally, but he doesn’t care about the LGBTQ+ community,” Obergefell said. said on MSNBC “The Reid Out.”

In a 5-4 decision released Friday, the Supreme Court voted to overturn Roe v. Wade. The majority opinion argued that the 14th Amendment, which prevents states from depriving citizens of “life, liberty, or property without due process of law”, does not protect the right to abortion.

In a concurring opinion following the ruling, Thomas wrote that “we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence and Obergefell.”

These cases respectively protect the right to access contraception, same-sex relations and same-sex marriage.

loving v. Virginia, which protects the right to interracial marriage and also relates to the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, was not on Thomas’ list.

Thomas himself is in an interracial marriage with right-wing activist Ginni Thomas.

“I’m just concerned that hundreds of thousands of marriages across this country are in jeopardy and the ability of people across this country to marry the person they love is in jeopardy,” Obergefell said. “And for Judge Thomas to omit Loving v. Virginia altogether, in my mind, is quite telling.”

Experts say the Supreme Court’s decision on Roe could have far-reaching impacts on a host of civil rights rulings. In a dissenting opinion, the three liberal justices warned that if the Tory justices were ‘right’ in their decision, ‘all those decisions’ like same-sex marriage would also be ‘wrong’.

“It’s against our equality, it’s against our ability to be part of ‘We the People,'” Obergefell said. “So this concurring opinion, to me, is just a roadmap for opponents of LGBTQ+ equality to come after these rulings and make sure we know they believe we are citizens. second class not worthy of protection and not worthy of equality, so I’m just concerned.”

Read the original article on Business Insider

News Today Yahoo news


Not all news on the site expresses the point of view of the site, but we transmit this news automatically and translate it through programmatic technology on the site and not from a human editor.
Back to top button