Jean Messiha threatens to sue Moundir and Gilles Verdez in “Touche pas à mon poste”

Often invited in “Touche pas à mon poste”, Jean Messiha was present in the C8 talk this Monday, November 20. The polemicist was heard today by the authorities for “organized gang fraud” after opening a kitty in favor of the family of the police officer responsible for the fatal shooting of young Nahel, on June 27, 2023. A trial that he considers “more political than civic”. Riots then broke out all over France. The prize pool raised 1.6 million euros.

The question asked by Cyril Hanouna to his columnists is simple: are they shocked by this jackpot? The board is divided. Among the detractors of Jean Messiha, Gilles Verdez. The latter considers that having communicated the data of Nahel’s criminal history “receipt”.

I’m not the one who’s going to pay the lawyer’s fees.

Cyril Hanouna in “TPMP”

After a first inaudible exchange, Gilles Verdez provokes his opponent: “Receiver, respond!” You laughed less there.” “It’s a fallacious argument, I didn’t authorize you to address me as familiar to me, Souleymane”retorts Jean Messiha, in reference to the first name that the columnist adopted after his marriage.

In the cacophony of “Touche pas à mon poste”, Jean Messiha declares : “what you say is defamatory, you will be attacked for that”. “I’m not the one who’s going to pay the lawyer’s fees.”quips Cyril Hanouna.

It’s Moundir’s turn to speak. The columnist was strongly criticized last week after taking a position against Elisabeth Lévy. This evening, he is also one of the columnists who say they are shocked by the jackpot opened by Jean Messiha. “I have the firm conviction that you are not a crook and that this is not an organized gang network. I find that you made Nahel, rest his soul, appear like the delinquent he is not.begins the columnist before adding: “the difference between you and Nahel is that you have a criminal record that taints”.

Moundir has not reviewed

“I don’t have a criminal record. You defame, you will join Gilles Verdez”, retorts Jean Messiha, to the laughter of the set. “You were also convicted, I revised it, don’t worry”insists Moundir. “See, that’s the point of doing the ENA and a doctorate in Economic Sciences, because what you say is false”explains the guest, supported by Jacques Cardoze. “It depends on the categories of conviction”explains the journalist.

Indeed, there are offenses which fall within the framework of a “reminder of the law”. The public prosecutor concerned can apply “alternative measures to criminal proceedings” which are supposed to help explain the fault and “give a second chance” to the offender who has been arrested. In this case, these offenses are not recorded in any way in the criminal record.